Mandalay Bay's "Romper Room"
The following two rules, which are unique to the Mandalay Bay Poker Room, illustrates this point. The first is a rule that I have previously discussed, concerns how they handle the blinds in their "half kill" game. A half kill game is when a player wins 2 hands in a row and the limits are increased by 50% for the next hand. In a $4 - $8 limit hold-em game the limits go up to $6 - $12, with the winning player having to post a blind 50% higher than the normal big blind regardless of his/her position. In every other poker room in town, the player posting the biggest blind is given the option to be the last to act before the flop. But NOT at Mandalay Bay, there the person posting the most money before the flop must act in turn. When I asked the poker room manager why Mandalay Bay was the only room in town to have such a rule, the "Romper Room" mentality raised it's ugly head. I was told that : "It is less confusing." Intuitively this rule makes no sense. If a person is forced to post 50% more than the big blind before he/she even sees their cards, they should at least be given the opportunity to be the last to act before the flop. What I failed to do was after receiving the above answer to my initial question, I should have followed-up with: "Less confusing to who? The player or dealer?"
The other rule which I just recently observed and is the reason for this blog, concerns "straddling". It is similar to the previous rule in that it also involves the posting of the biggest blind before the flop. A "straddle" is a blind posted by the player immediately next to the big blind, and is usually double the big blind, or the amount of the first limit bet plus the big blind. By straddling, the player is given the option of being the last person to act. The reasons for a straddle are numerous and wide ranging, but basically a person straddles to loosen up a tight game and/or to "show-off."
This past weekend, while doing "research" for a request made be one of my legion of fan, I found myself in a $2 - $4 limit hold-em game at Mandalay Bay. The game had only one blind for $2, the amount of the first 2 limit bets. About an hour into the game I decided to straddle (I'll leave it up to the reader to determine my motive) and post $4 before the cards were dealt. After the hand was dealt, a player positioned about half way around the table decided to teach me a lesson and raised my straddle.*
*WRITER'S NOTE: At this point in time, I am going to introduce yet another new feature to "Poker Tales from VegasSheep" called: "You make the call."
How much do you think the player raised? Remember, you are in a $2 - $4 LIMIT game. If you had said $2 for a total bet of $6, you would be WRONG! Not in the "Romper Room" mentality of Mandalay Bay. Although the player did try to raise $2, he was strongly reprimanded by the dealer and later by the floorman (which I eventually called over for a "final" ruling) that he had to raise $4, double my total post. After the initial shock of the ruling, I naturally reraised just to see how far they would carry forward this lunacy. To my disappointment, they would not let me make it a total bet of $16, instead I could only raise $4 for a total bet of $12. After the flop, I was the first to act and immediately bet $4. I'm sure some of you already know what is coming next. That's right, I was informed that I was in a $2 - $4 limit game, and the most I could bet was $2 after the flop.
If anyone can explain the logic behind this policy, please email me. I'm at a loss to figure what their rationale is for such an idiotic rule. Are they afraid that players might get confused if they could not raise the same amount as the blind, even thou it was a straddle and not technically a blind. My only consolation to this rule is that I am not the only one who doesn't know why this rule exists. I asked the floorman the rationale for his ruling and all he could say was: It's the rule."
So, Congratulations Mandalay Bay! You are the latest recipient of "What the @#$%& Were You Thinking Award", rules category. So, although rules are important in running an efficient poker room, you must have enough faith in your patrons to treat them as adults with sufficient gray matter to make logical decisions. Afterall the last time I looked, a person had to be at least 21 to gamble in a casino.

